Cohocton Wind Watch

Citizens, Residents and Neighbors concerned about ill-conceived wind turbine projects in the Town of Cohocton and adjacent townships in Western New York.

Wednesday, February 28, 2007

Use domain name url for Reform Cohocton

New domain name url http://reformcohocton.org/ redirect to Reform Cohocton.

This address point to http://reformcohocton.blogspot.com/
Posted by SARTRE at 11:40 AM
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Blog Archive

  • ►  2018 (3)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2017 (18)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (7)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2016 (17)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  April (7)
    • ►  March (4)
  • ►  2015 (29)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2014 (23)
    • ►  December (5)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2013 (103)
    • ►  December (7)
    • ►  November (9)
    • ►  October (16)
    • ►  September (14)
    • ►  August (11)
    • ►  July (11)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (7)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  February (7)
    • ►  January (7)
  • ►  2012 (163)
    • ►  December (8)
    • ►  November (14)
    • ►  October (13)
    • ►  September (19)
    • ►  August (12)
    • ►  July (15)
    • ►  June (10)
    • ►  May (9)
    • ►  April (15)
    • ►  March (15)
    • ►  February (17)
    • ►  January (16)
  • ►  2011 (339)
    • ►  December (26)
    • ►  November (22)
    • ►  October (29)
    • ►  September (40)
    • ►  August (30)
    • ►  July (19)
    • ►  June (26)
    • ►  May (24)
    • ►  April (27)
    • ►  March (36)
    • ►  February (26)
    • ►  January (34)
  • ►  2010 (593)
    • ►  December (33)
    • ►  November (44)
    • ►  October (58)
    • ►  September (31)
    • ►  August (32)
    • ►  July (43)
    • ►  June (50)
    • ►  May (61)
    • ►  April (61)
    • ►  March (67)
    • ►  February (62)
    • ►  January (51)
  • ►  2009 (707)
    • ►  December (70)
    • ►  November (92)
    • ►  October (99)
    • ►  September (98)
    • ►  August (68)
    • ►  July (85)
    • ►  June (72)
    • ►  May (50)
    • ►  April (29)
    • ►  March (23)
    • ►  February (9)
    • ►  January (12)
  • ►  2008 (944)
    • ►  December (10)
    • ►  November (36)
    • ►  October (54)
    • ►  September (62)
    • ►  August (142)
    • ►  July (73)
    • ►  June (121)
    • ►  May (96)
    • ►  April (98)
    • ►  March (80)
    • ►  February (84)
    • ►  January (88)
  • ▼  2007 (701)
    • ►  December (56)
    • ►  November (51)
    • ►  October (64)
    • ►  September (53)
    • ►  August (46)
    • ►  July (53)
    • ►  June (71)
    • ►  May (68)
    • ►  April (69)
    • ►  March (73)
    • ▼  February (47)
      • Noise Radiation From Wind Turbines Installed Near ...
      • New York Regional Interconnection
      • 400 MW of Wind Capacity Produces O MW of Power
      • Use domain name url for Reform Cohocton
      • This is My Land...I can do what I want
      • Low Frequency Noise and Infrasound
      • Hamlin wind tower committee faces overflow crowd
      • A Brief Cost-Benefit Analysis of Industrial Windpower
      • The Top Ten False and Misleading Claims the Windpo...
      • My Turn: Don't sacrifice Northeast Kingdom to wind...
      • CV Comp Plan addresses resources by Janine Giordano
      • Inconvenient truths about wind power
      • Cherry Valley Final Draft of Comprehensive Plan
      • State Supreme Court to hear Highland Co. wind ener...
      • An idyll lost in turbines' humming by Jenna Russell
      • Wind tower mishap snarls Route 1 traffic
      • Can Cohocton take this kind of excitement?
      • Tilting at Wind Energy by William Tucker
      • Comments on SDEIS Cohocton Wind Power Project by B...
      • Town of Howard meeting rescheduled
      • WSJ letter to the editor by Glenn Schleede
      • Turbine, power-line proposals connected by Andy Mc...
      • No, President Bush did NOT state that wind could s...
      • Some Towns Not Listening On Wind by Stephen Berg
      • "Our purpose is to project potential noise into th...
      • Pitched as source of clean energy, ranchers say mi...
      • Yes! Wind has it all wrong by Karl Palmiter
      • It's Free, Plentiful and Fickle by Matthew Wald
      • Debate Over Wind Power Creates Environmental Rift ...
      • Bovina wind survey finds concern by Dana Cudmore
      • UPC pattern of business conduct - Is this the Publ...
      • LURC commissioners upheld rule of law
      • Golisano Firm Touts Wind Power In Chautauqua Co
      • Golisano helps push new wind energy plan
      • International Conference on Wind Turbine Noise
      • A Problem With Wind Power by Eric Rosenbloom
      • Problems associated with wind turbines by Mr. Monf...
      • The Pentagon's Cautious Tilt On Windmills - Washin...
      • Howard New York Informational meeting on Windfarms
      • BISHOP WIND FARM PPM ATLANTIC REST IN PEACE
      • Construction of a wind energy facility on Mars Hil...
      • Reply to letter from UPC Vermont Wind
      • Response to claims made by UPC Wind Partners by Er...
      • Construction on Mars Hill, Maine
      • Clipper Windpower Announces Sale of 200 MW of Libe...
      • Fenner Blade Failure January 28, 2007
      • Anti-wind groups cry foul by KRISTYN ECOCHARD
    • ►  January (50)
  • ►  2006 (299)
    • ►  December (16)
    • ►  November (29)
    • ►  October (43)
    • ►  September (31)
    • ►  August (38)
    • ►  July (24)
    • ►  June (67)
    • ►  May (41)
    • ►  April (10)
Awesome Inc. theme. Powered by Blogger.