Wednesday, January 31, 2007

Mars Hill residents voice concerns over wind tower noise by Rachel Rice

Wendy and Perrin Todd knew what would happen to their view of Mars Hill Mountain when crews starting erecting wind towers near their backyard.

They braced themselves when their home, newly built on the north side of the mountain, shook because of the blasting.

But what shocked them — and what they said this week they should not be expected to live with — is the noise.

"They turned on tower Number 9, and almost immediately it made enough noise that it was like, ‘Oh my gosh, that can’t be right,’" Wendy Todd said.

"It all depends on the wind speed and direction, but the best way to describe it is you step outside and look up thinking there’s an airplane. It’s like a high-range jet, high-low roar, but with the windmills, there’s a sort of on and off ‘phfoop ... phfoop ... phfoop’ noise."

That’s one "phfoop" or more every two seconds as the turbine’s three blades rotate from 10 to 22 revolutions per minute. It’s loud enough, Todd said, that she can hold her cell phone outside her home and the person on the other end of the call can clearly hear the sound.

Even though tower No. 9 has been shut down in the wake of noise complaints, several local residents who live close to the mountain said they’re worried about what they’ll hear when all 28 wind turbines start rotating sometime in mid-February. Currently 16 turbines are in operation.

The Mars Hill Wind Farm is the biggest wind power operation to come to New England. From its inception, company officials said noise from the towers would not be an issue.

Evergreen Wind Power LLC of Bangor, a subsidiary of UPC Wind Management, has spent four years and about $85 million on the project, which is expected to generate an estimated 42 megawatts of electricity annually or enough to supply about 45,000 Maine homes at full capacity. A public relations official for the company said Thursday that he could not disclose where the power is being sold.

"That is competitively sensitive information that we are not at liberty to share," Ric Tyler said in an e-mail. Other written questions the Bangor Daily News submitted to the company, including about the noise issue, could not be answered by Thursday evening, according to Tyler.

Since the project began last spring, there have been local concerns about how construction is driving away wildlife and the way the towers are changing the face of the mountain, but up until now, there wasn’t much anxiety about noise.

A town official confirmed that the "noise issue" came up a few weeks ago when the wind turbines first started powering up. An official with the Department of Environmental Protection said that the regional office has received half a dozen formal complaints about noises connected to the project.

Living under the towers

On Monday, the sun was glistening off the sleek, metal towers lining the ridge above Mountain Road. Inside Merle and Carol Cowperthwaite’s home, a few local residents gathered to talk about the turbines and their concerns.

The Cowperthwaites, the Todds and Wendy Todd’s parents, Wallace and Ella Boyd, pointed out that they haven’t heard wildlife — owls, bears and coyotes — like they used to. And then there’s the brook that ripples down the mountain.

"If you take Number 9 and multiply it, we worry that we won’t be able to hear that [brook] anymore," Wendy Todd said.

Carol Cowperthwaite pointed out that people who live near the mountain, especially along Mountain Road, do so because they like the solitude, they crave the peace and quiet.

"One night, I kept wondering why the furnace wouldn’t shut off and then I realized it wasn’t that, it was the windmills outside," Merle Cowperthwaite said. He feels particularly pessimistic about the wind turbines.

"The only thing we’ve got going for us is we’re getting older and that means we’re getting deafer," he said.

The couples agreed that the noises they’ve heard so far go beyond annoyance or frustration.

"Our sleep patterns have already been interrupted," Perrin Todd said. "And that’s with only a few [turbines] running. We assume our sleep patterns would worsen once all of them are up and running."

When local residents first heard the noises from the wind towers, they called up company officials wanting to know whether this was part of the testing phase or if it was how the turbines would always sound. They soon learned that a sound level analysis conducted by Resource Systems Engineering Inc. in 2003 indicated that the sound level at dozens of residences around the mountain had the potential to exceed limits set by the DEP.

Properties in the analysis were listed as either protected residential locations or quiet areas under DEP guidelines. In protected residential locations, the "hearing response of the human ear" to sounds cannot exceed 60 decibels during the day and 50 at night. In quiet areas, the restriction drops to 55 decibels during the day and 45 at night.

RSE officials predicted that with a proposed 35 turbines running at 95 percent of their capacity, 44 properties would hear sound levels above 45 decibels and 18 of them would hear levels above 55 decibels.

Some of that information was included in the Mars Hill Wind Farm permit application, which was submitted by the company and the town of Mars Hill to the DEP. An appendix on noise analysis by RSE Inc., stated that, "the wind turbines only operate when the wind is blowing, and any noise they generate is often masked by the background noise caused by the wind."

It points out that sounds from the project "may exceed noise standards at some of the dwellings located to the north of the project," but that turbine locations in those areas will be used only if more detailed analysis shows that noise standards will be met or if easements or leases are acquired by potentially affected properties.

The Todds, the Boyds and the Cowperthwaites say no one has approached them about easements or leases and, as far as they know, no one has approached any of their neighbors about them, either.

They also said that none of their neighbors knew anything about the sound analysis or the information on noise in the permit application, though they later learned that both have been available to the public for months at the Mars Hill Town Office.

Officials did not respond to inquiries about efforts the company made to ensure nearby residents knew about the noise levels from the turbines or whether the company will be doing anything to address those concerns now.

Last week, about 15 residents around the mountain gathered to discuss the documents and what they wanted to do about it. They decided to bring their concerns to the Mars Hill Town Council and get some answers to their questions. A request by Perrin Todd to address council members about the noise from the wind farm is the first item on the council’s Jan. 29 agenda.
More questions than answers

Mars Hill Town Manager Ray Mersereau said Thursday that he doesn’t have many answers to give about the noise issue. He confirmed that Evergreen told the town that the turbines would make hardly any noise, and that’s what he’s experienced when he’s stood directly under the towers.

Mersereau also confirmed that town officials had to sign off on the permit application for the wind farm, but that he doesn’t know whether officials saw the noise information included.
"I don’t know if they saw it, but it was in the permit," Mersereau said. "Not everyone, including myself, read every part of the permit."

He pointed out, though, that town approval for the project was contingent on the company’s ability to meet state and federal environmental permit requirements, including noise standards under Maine law. He said the company will be required to keep the wind farm within Maine noise standards.

"If they’re not meeting the noise level requirements in the permit, is the company doing something to modify that? The DEP believed the company would be able to meet noise level requirements by permit," Mersereau said. "If they’re not meeting them, some sort of enforcement action will have to be taken."

Mersereau said there’s no way to know whether the company is meeting the permit requirements until sound level measurements are taken. That effort is under way now, both by contractors for the company and by the DEP.

Nick Archer, regional director for the DEP, said Thursday from his office in Presque Isle that a complaint investigation is under way.

"We’ll be working with the company and those with complaints to go over the standards for noise that have to be met, and where they have to be met," Archer said.

The work will take place over the next few months, he said.

"If they’re operating within the parameters of the permit, that’s as far as it will go, but we’re a long way from there yet," Archer said. "If they’re not, then the power company will have the opportunity to bring the issue into compliance. It’s the same way we deal with every complaint we receive."

While local residents await the measurement results, they’re very aware that the day is quickly approaching when all the turbines will be rotating.

"We have nothing against alternate forms of energy, but when it’s at the expense of residential living, people need to be aware of the facts," Perrin Todd said. "It has to be put in a location where it’s not so intrusive on people’s lives and dreams."

Tuesday, January 30, 2007

Evaluation of Environmental Shadow Flicker Analysis for “Dutch Hill Wind Power Project” by Rick Bolton

Final Version on Shadow Flicker

http://www.barehillsoftware.com/Shadow%20Flicker%20Analysis%20of%20UPC%20Wind%20_Cohocton_%20SDEIS_1b,%20RBolton.pdf

UPC and Goldman

--~-- UPC Wind --~--
Mr. Keel joins UPC from GE Energy Financial Services (EFS) where he led financial ... Country Energy Pipeline, and assets held by Goldman Sachs - Cogentrix. ...
http://www.upcwind.com/about-team-PeterKeel.php

Kirby Mountain: UPC Wind misinforms
UPC Wind Partners is a subsidiary of UPC Group, which is based in Italy. ... Goldman Sachs wants out of wind biz? A question about renewable energy ...
http://kirbymtn.blogspot.com/2006/07/upc-wind-misinforms.html

Kirby Mountain: Goldman Sachs wants out of wind biz?
Goldman Sachs wants to sell Horizon Wind Energy, which it bought last year (then ... Vermont legislators want to dump renewable energy · UPC's continuing ...
http://kirbymtn.blogspot.com/2006/12/goldman-sachs-wants-out-of-wind-biz.html

Madison Dearborn Partners > Principals
Prior to joining MDP, Mr. Alsikafi was with Goldman, Sachs & Co. in the financial ... L.L.C. (d.b.a. Boise Cascade), and UPC Wind Management, LLC. ..
http://www.mdcp.com/principals_directors.asp

SEARCH Enter the first few letters of the lastname OR company name ...
UPC WIND PARTNERS LLC. MARYANN, GEAR, THE DYSON CORPORATION. ERIC, GEBHARDT, GE ENERGY ... GOODWIN, ZILKHA RENEWABLE/GOLDMAN SACHS. JIM, GORDON, CAPE WIND ...
https://register.rcsreg.com/regos-1.0/wind2005/adv/look/lookup.html?lastname=G

SEARCH Enter the first few letters of the lastname OR company name ...
ZILKHA RENEWABLE/GOLDMAN SACHS. MIKE, ROBERTS, PPM ENERGY INC. RICHARD, ROBERTS ... UPC WIND PARTNERS LLC. ALASTAIR, ROSS, PRICE FORBES LIMITED ...
https://register.rcsreg.com/regos-1.0/wind2005/adv/look/lookup.html?lastname=R

TO: SCPPA Board of Directors FROM: Bill D. Carnahan SUBJECT ...
UPC Wind Corridor Project, and has been selected as the underwriter, ... Goldman Sachs: CMS Strategy. • Citigroup: Tax and Yield Curve Risk Management ...

US/Canada Wind Power Markets and Strategies 2005-2010 - Market ...
4.4.8 Horizon Wind Energy/Goldman Sachs 4.4.9 Eurus Energy ... Airtricity - Catamount Energy - UPC Wind - Cape Wind LLC - Major Wind Developer Strategy ...

Euromoney Energy Events
How are wind farms being financed? Where is the boom in financing ... GE Energy Financial Services; Goldman Sachs; Good Energies; Horizon Wind Energy, LLC; ...
http://www.euromoneyenergy.com/default.asp?Page=4&SID=627129&ISS=21780

Howard town board members fear full disclosure by Art Giacalone ESQ 1/26/07

Bill Hatch, Bob Palmer and Lowell Smith are Howard town board mem­bers who voted in February 2006 to adopt a wind energy facilities law authorizing the town board to approve WEF permits for industrial-scale wind turbines. Standards and setbacks contained in the law are so weak that Howard Wind LLC and Everpower will be able to construct 492-foot tall turbines without meaningfully protecting town residents.

Hatch, Palmer and Smith are also landowners who will earn large annual revenues from wind turbines on their private properties if Howard Wind's pending application is approved. A letter from Everpower tells prospective "participating landowners" that they could expect pay­ments of between $14,000 and $18,000 per year for each wind turbine. The typi­cal agreement lasts between 15 to 30 years.

In November 2006, state Supreme Court told the three elected officials to fully dis­close their "financial rela­tionship" with Howard Wind, including the extent to which they "will financially bene­fit" from the approval of the pending application. They have failed to make the dis­closures, and have adopted a new strategy. On February 14,2007, they intend to amend Howard's existing WEF law to transfer the power to grant WEF permits to the town Planning Board. There's a problem, however. The same town board mem­bers who have so much to gain financially if Howard Wind's proposed project is approved are the ones who hand-select the Planning Board members.

The public deserves full disclosure, not self-serving officials intent on "having their cake and eating it too."

Sunday, January 28, 2007

Wind Turbines and Conflicts of Interest Meeting

The League of Woman Voters of Orleans County is sponsoring a presentation called - Better Government: Avoiding Conflicts of Interest on February 8, 2007 at the Large Group Instruction Room at the Albion High School at 7:00pm, this event is free.

The article mentions that as wind companies target land in Orleans County, including property owned by officials on planning boards and other local government officials, a conflict of interest may arise for those officials in reviewing the projects. It states that "Local officials may also face other conflicts of interest when they vote on projects that may directly or indiregtly benefit themselves or their families"

James Magavern, a senior partner from Magavern, Magavern and Grimm in Buffalo, NY will be the guest speaker. He concentrates in the areas of health, corporate, state and local government law.

TOWN OF CANADICE, NY Wind Mill Law

wecs.pdf

Cohocton Deserves Honest Government by Judith Hall

The crisis of confidence in the Zigenfus administration has reached a boiling point. Their management of town government is incompetent and an insult to every law-abiding citizen. Protecting our town is a sacred and profound duty.

Mr. Hunt’s integrity has been challenged for ethical violations. Why won’t the Town Board fulfill their duty and have the Ethics Committee investigate the charges? Curt Helf the code enforcement officer was told to issue stop work orders on legally issued building permits. There was no legal basis for this Zigenfus order. Mr. Helf was terminated for following NYS building code laws. Is this the level of ethics for any public official?

Remember that James Sherron of SCIDA has provided a copy of the PILOT scheme, which has $500.00 per MW being shared by the Town, the School District and the County. That translates into a mere $9,000 to the Town from the UPC Phase I project for the first year.

Does this sound like the Zigenfus administration is practicing sound government? They have cost the Town money by ignoring NY State as well as local zoning laws.

Cohocton needs a choice for new leadership and an administration that practices common sense economic development. When did you last have a choice when voting for the Town Council? This November will be different.

Republicans, Democrats and Independents are welcome and encouraged to support and become involved with a team of your neighbors who will put an end to the deception and selective cronyism that is the root cause of Cohocton’s distressed divide. Cohocton has gone backwards. In order to achieve a prosperous future we all must have an open government and sound business practices that represent ALL of our residents.

This coming November, Cohocton voters will be able to decide if Jack, Wayne and Milt are deserving of your trust. Come to the next Town Board meeting Feb 20, 2007 and voice your input to your town officials. The Zigenfus rule that bans comments from the floor is just the latest disgrace coming out of a town administration that fears the public and competition at the ballot box.

What Is Truly Wrong With Cohocton by James Hall

The 1/19/07 Public Hearing on the SDEIS Phase I and the DEIS Phase II of the UPC project was clear evidence why Cohocton has been in systemic decay for decades. The Cohocton Planning Board has demonstrated that it is but a rubber stamp for the UPC developer. Allowing a UPC “dog and pony show” to take up the limited time for citizen comments during a public hearing is unconscionable. Any reasonable person knows that if there really are two separate projects, two distinct and independent public hearings would be appropriate.

The factual, scientific, rational and common sense arguments against the ill sited industrial wind project were not refuted. The best the Old Regime could muster is a demand that the opponents of UPC should move out of town. This typifies the core issue why Cohocton has been a failed community. Bully and drive out the well-informed, prosperous and experienced so that certain families can maintain their blood line strangle hold on Cohocton. Just how well have they done in the past and how are they doing now?

The greed of the UPC leaseholder is on a scale only surpassed by their gullibility for buying into a golden goose fairy tale. Do you really think you are going to see turbine construction this year! Will you be planting this spring or when will you receive those UPC lease payments that were promised? The clipper turbines aren’t even being manufactured yet and Clipper has a five year contract that covers all maintenance. How many Cohocton workers will be employed by the manufacturer?

By now all residents should understand that there will be no free or reduced electric bills coming from a UPC project. Check you bill, NYSEC is now charging you to subsidize the wind developers (the RPS monthly charge on your bill). So why approve this interdependent project? To benefit the financial interests of growers who no longer want to farm? Or for officials who seem interested in only one particular enterprise?

The Town Board approved a bond of $50,000 to borrow money for anticipated legal actions. Why not just comply with SEQR and observe state regulations by providing set backs that will protect public safety? If a project was designed and incorporated these safeguards, you would not need local taxpayers to bear the burden of that Albany law firm.

Fear is a typical tactic used to silence good citizens who are apathetic or accustomed to allowing a select few to run the town. Their time has passed and a new dawn is on the horizon. What is at stake is not just the siting of industrial wind turbines but the sacred principle of democratic participation in crucial community decisions. No longer will their political corruption be subjected upon the majority of property owners. The Town of Cohocton needs a real choice and it will have one in the next election.

The chairman of the Cohocton Planning Board has admitted when challenged that he is “just doing what he is told!” That mindset is unacceptable. The ethical course is to fulfill their sworn duties in a fair, rational and objective manner. That means obeying NYS codes and dismissing legal counsel that perverts the basic protections provided within the law. Any member of government that is unable or unwilling to adhere to this standard does not deserve community support and should resign.

Those of moral character know in their heart that the UPC project will not bring prosperity to our town. At its core - it has always been a bad business deal. New leadership, balanced benefits, hard work and practical business initiatives that create a genuine future for our children and grandchildren should be the proper goal for everyone. The voice of opportunity cries out, oppose the wicked ways of the Town Board or be resigned to a life of servitude in a UPC company town.

Saturday, January 27, 2007

Mars Hill residents voice concerns over wind tower noise by Rachel Rice

When local residents first heard the noises from the wind towers, they called up company officials wanting to know whether this was part of the testing phase or if it was how the turbines would always sound. They soon learned that a sound level analysis conducted by Resource Systems Engineering Inc. in 2003 indicated that the sound level at dozens of residences around the mountain had the potential to exceed limits set by the DEP.

“If they’re not meeting the noise level requirements in the permit, is the company doing something to modify that? The DEP believed the company would be able to meet noise level requirements by permit,” Mersereau said. “If they’re not meeting them, some sort of enforcement action will have to be taken.”

(click on this link for the entire article)

Friday, January 26, 2007

Enfield wind farm project is a fraud at fundamental level by Paul Sheridan

There is an adage, “The road to hell is paved with good intentions.” Indeed, when the subject is complex and esoteric, the common person needs to be on guard. Self-proclaimed proponents of energy and the environment have a notorious history of taking advantage of our good intentions. A contemporary example for the Ithaca community is the ludicrous proposal of John Rancich to deface the Finger Lakes landscape with windmills under the guise of “sustainable energy.”

Rancich has offered to do you a favor you don't recall asking for. The esoteric reality is that the proposal is a fraud at fundamental levels, and so fundamentals are what he will publicly avoid like the plague! Let's take a look at just a few.

(click on link for the entire article)

Wednesday, January 24, 2007

LURC rejects Redington wind farm by Donna M. Perry

FARMINGTON–The Maine Land Use Regulation Commission voted, 6-1 against rezoning 1,004 mountaintop acres in northern Franklin County for a 30-turbine wind-energy project today.

Only commissioner Stephen Wight, of Newry, supported the rezoning request.

The commission's staff had previously recommended the rezoning be approved.

The proposed $130-million wind farm was to be built on the ridges of Redington Pond Range and Black Nubble mountains in Redington Township, about 4 miles west of Sugarloaf/USA in Carrabassett Valley.

Members of Maine's environmental community have said the power project is not necessary and would damage forever a pristine stretch of Maine mountains. They have also argue the view from the Appalachian Trail would be damaged for hikers and the project could damage the habitats of endangered species of birds and aniimals.

Those opposed to the project have also argued the LURC staff recommendation to approve the rezoning was illegal.

They say the proposal failed to demonstrate that it would create no “undue, adverse impacts” and that it is not consistent with LURC’s comprehensive land use plan.

Supporters of the project said it would have provided a long-overdue means to generate non-polluting power and would have been a boon for the local economy.

NYISO New Generation Project Report

The attached document shows over 4000mw of wind proposed in upstate New York behind highly constrained interfaces. According to the GE-NYSERDA report, the maximum wind capacity that could be placed in upstate NY is 2800 mw before wind would negatively impact nuclear and hydro production and degrade reliability of the system. We believe you have a good case to show how an unconstrained RPS is resulting in too many renewables which produce off-peak, off-season, and far from load. This is leading to consequences that could have, and should have, been addressed before reaching this point.

One point to bear in mind: the NYSERDA report stated that onshore wind would have an effective capacity of around 9%, i.e. of the 4000mw of installed capacity, you can reasonably rely on 9% to meet peak demand or 360mw.

NYISONewGenProjectReport1.pdf

Worried about the winds of change

Daily%20Messenger-%20Worried%20about%20Winds%20of%20Change1.pdf

Daily Messenger article By AMY CAVAUER

People with varied interests and concerns learned about the pros and cons of the renewable energy source.

Revised versions of the noise analyses for DEIS UPC Phase II by Rick Bolton

Noise_Analysis_of_UPC_Wind__Dutch_Hill__DEISRev1%20RBolton.pdf